Collin v. O'MALLEY’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2001
2 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Falk v. Brennan · Schnell v. City of Chicago · Frierson v. Spruill · Donahue v. Staunton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the movant has demonstrated a strong showing of likelihood of success on the merits of the appeal; (2) whether the movant will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the stay; (3) the degree to which a stay will substantially harm the other party; and (4) whether it is “in the public interest” to grant the stay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dionne v. Bouley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.