United States v. Roush’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1673 · 18 U.S.C. § 1593 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 3556 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3612 · 18 U.S.C. § 3613 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Miller · United States v. Phillips · United States v. Stout · 312 F. Supp. 2d 802 - United States v. James · United States v. Love
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The government claims that at any time it can collect the full amount of restitution, without needing court approval; because that ability would be inconsistent with the judicial control over timing of restitution set forth in the statute, as well as the language in the judgment providing for a payment schedule, the Court grants [defendant’s] motion to quash.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a person obligated to provide restitution, or pay a fine, receives substantial resources from any source, including inheritance, settlement, or other judgment, during a period of incarceration, such person shall be required to apply the value of such resources to any restitution or fine still owed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If upon commencement of the term of supervised release any part of the restitution remains unpaid, the defendant shall make payments on such unpaid balance beginning 60 days after the release from custody at the rate of $500 per month until the restitution is paid in full.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.