Reese v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2008
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Rideout v. United States · Delli Paoli v. United States · Ristaino v. Ross · Loyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(a) A person conspires to commit a felony when, with intent to commit the felony, he agrees with another person to commit the felony. A conspiracy to commit a felony is a felony of the same class as the underlying felony. However, a conspiracy to commit murder is a Class A felony. "(b) The state must allege and prove that either the person or the person with whom he agreed performed an overt act in furtherance of the agreement." Ind. Code § 85-41-5-2 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Abner v. State · Perkins v. State“"The law does not require a formal agreement; the existence of the agreement may be inferred from the conduct of the parties or proved by circumstantial evidence. Woods v. State, (1980) 274 Ind. 624 , 413 N.E.2d 572, 573 ; Patterson v. State, (1979) 270 Ind. 469, 478 , 386 N.E.2d 936, 942 , cert. denied (1979) 444 U.S. 935 , 100 S.Ct. 283 , 62 L.Ed.2d 194 . The intent may be inferred from the acts committed and the circumstances surrounding the case. Young v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 173, 177 , 273 N.E.2d 285, 287 . A conviction for conspiracy may be based solely upon circumstantial evidence. Patterson, supra [270 Ind]. at 942 [ 386 N.E.2d 936 ]."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.