Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 NW2D 648 - Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.

Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
8
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 21 Cal. 4th 815 - Vandenberg v. Superior Court (1999), Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C. (1995)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 30 state decisions

190199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co. · Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. · Gammel v. Ernst & Ernst · Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the issue was identical to one in a prior adjudication; (2) there was a final judgment on the merits; (3) the estopped party was a party or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication; and (4) the estopped party was given a full and fair opportunity to be heard on the adjudicated issue.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An offensive estoppel is one where the plaintiff seeking to invoke [collateral estoppel] uses it to establish an issue in the second action on which it has the burden of proof”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Respondents seek to invoke the estoppel as a defense on the issue. This is, of course, traditional `defensive collateral estoppel' and is favored in the law”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.