State v. Kettle’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993)
Relies on Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · United States v. Wheeler · Abbate v. United States · Heath v. Alabama · United States v. Lanza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Red Kettle's state sentences must be concurrent, rather than consecutive, to the respective federal sentences[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Red Kettle“to resentence Red Kettle consistent with this opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Red Kettle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.