Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 N.W.2d 785 - State v. Braddock

State v. Braddock’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2023

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · Rogers v. United States · Perry v. Rushen · 120 Wis. 2d 614 - State v. Denny

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the evidence is really of no appreciable value, no harm is done in admitting it; while if it is in truth calculated to cause the jury to doubt, the Court should not attempt to decide for the jury that this doubt is purely speculative and fantastic, but should afford the accused every opportunity to create this doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “balance the importance of the evidence for the defendant against the State's interest in preserving orderly trials and excluding unreliable or prejudicial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]he third party perpetrator rule cannot be used to prevent the defendant from establishing his defense, or deny him the right to a fair jury trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.