Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 NW2D 790 - State v. Rome

State v. Rome’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 126 Cal. App. 3d 952 - People v. Patrick · Cleveland v. Municipality of Anchorage · State v. Johnson · State v. Reese · State v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he defense of necessity [is] properly raised when the offered evidence, if believed by the jury, would support a finding by them that the offense ... was justified by a reasonable fear of death or bodily harm so imminent or emergent that, according to ordinary standards of intelligence and morality, the desirability of avoiding the injury outweighs the desirability of avoiding the public injury arising from the offense committed[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.