Trask v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2014
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa · Hemmer v. United States · In Re Lewis'adoption · Crosbie v. Partridge · State Ex Rel. White v. Beeler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the review shall be conducted by the court without a jury and shall be confined to the record ....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“It was the intent, purpose and object of the Legislature, in enacting it, to provide a Uniform system of regulations concerning administrative procedures in and before, and judicial review of the actions of, all state boards, commissions, departments, authorities, bureaus and officers authorized by the Constitution or statutes to make 'rules' or to formulate 'orders' (as those terms are defined and used in the act) other than those specifically excepted, by the provisions of the act, from the operation thereof.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where two or more enactments are involved, the primary objective is to determine the latest expression of the legislative will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.