Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 PA 102 - Commonwealth v. Kates

Commonwealth v. Kates’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

219
cited by 219 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

213 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 219 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. M Scott (1998), Commonwealth v. Williams (2003)

213 state decisions — followed in 12 states

840197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Morrissey v. Brewer · Simmons v. United States · McGautha v. California · 1 Cal. 3d 641 - In Re Martinez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 219 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... A Parole [sic] revocation proceeding is concerned not only with protecting society, but also, and most importantly with rehabilitating and restoring to useful lives those placed in the custody of the Parole Board. To apply the exclusionary rule to parole revocation proceedings would tend to obstruct the parole system in accomplishing its remedial purposes. There is no need for double application of the exclusionary rule, using it first as it was used here in preventing criminal prosecution of the parolee and a second time at a parole revocation hearing. The deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule is adequately served by the exclusion of the unlawfully seized evidence in the criminal prosecution.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.