Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 PA 471 - Collins v. Gessler

Collins v. Gessler’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably Firing v. Kephart (1976), Berardocco v. Colden (1976)

32 state decisions

2001973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Hyneman · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. Brown · President Judge Determination Cases · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Baldrige v. Glass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judicial power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a unified judicial system consisting of the Supreme Court, the Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court, courts of common pleas, community court, municipal and traffic court in the City of Philadelphia, such other courts as may be provided by law and justices of the peace. All courts and justices of the peace and their jurisdiction shall be in this unified judicial system.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of: . . . (3) All cases of quo warranto as to any officer of statewide jurisdiction,””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]f our original jurisdiction is properly invoked in a quo warranto action involving a common pleas judge, because he has statewide jurisdiction, and a district justice of the peace has concurrent jurisdiction, as mandated by statute, with that of a common pleas judge, it follows inexorably that this Court possesses original jurisdiction in a quo warranto proceeding involving a district justice of the peace.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.