Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 Pa. Super. 82 - Commonwealth v. Baskerville

452 Pa. Super. 82 - Commonwealth v. Baskerville’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Commonwealth v. Markman (2007), 2001 Pa. Super. 238 - Commonwealth v. DiStefano (2001)

26 state decisions

1601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kremer v. Grant · City of Hazleton v. City Council · Commonwealth v. Clark · Krupinski v. Vocational Technical School Eastern Northampton County · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Anthony

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Malice consists of a “wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, cruelty, recklessness of consequences, and a mind regardless of social duty, although a particular person may not be intended to be injured.... ” Malice may be found where the defendant consciously disregarded an unjustified and extremely high risk that his actions might cause serious bodily injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The failure to rnclude the relevant facts for an analysis of appellate issues precludes this court from conducting a review on appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. 2119 (“[i]f reference is made to ... any other matter appearing m the record, the argument must set forth, m immediate connection therewith ... a reference to the place in the record where the matter referred appears.”).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.