Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 5, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-06-05

Relies on 82 So. 2d 870 - First Atlantic National Bank v. Cobbett · Privett v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2016

8 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the trial court committed a technical error in admitting the hearsay testimony complained of on appeal, see Privett v. State, 417 So.2d 805, 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), (b) the said error, however, was harmless in the context of this case as the evidence of guilt was overwhelming and the cause was tried non-jury. See First Atlantic National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, 82 So.2d 870, 871-72 (Fla.1955); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1983).

¶2Affirmed.