Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 SO2D 1195 - House v. Thompson

House v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2012

8 state decisions

401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · Loescher v. Parr · 365 So. 2d 1285 - Olsen v. Shell Oil Co. · 399 So. 2d 559 - Dorry v. LaFleur · 410 So. 2d 674 - Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “C. When the general verdict and the answers are harmonious, the court shall direct the entry of the appropriate judgment upon the verdict and answers. D. When the answers are consistent with each other but one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court may direct the entry of judgment in accordance with the answers, notwithstanding the general verdict, or may return the jury for further consideration of its answers and verdict, or may order a new trial. E. When the answers are inconsistent with each other and one or more is likewise inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall not direct the entry of judgment but may return the jury for further consideration of its answers or may order a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.