452 So. 2d 1302 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1993
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 408 So. 2d 1329 - State v. Sugar · 412 So. 2d 564 - State v. Herrod · State v. Brown · 443 So. 2d 632 - State v. Howard · 443 So. 2d 613 - State v. Hebert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant challenges the in-court identification of the defendant by the witness, Kelly Nelson, on the basis that it was tainted by a photographic lineup that contained two photos of the defendant. “Again we note the defendant failed to make any objection to the in-court identification. For the reasons discussed in assignment of error one, we find this assignment of error is without merit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mancino
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.