Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

452 So. 2d 952

J.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-06-05

Relies on 442 So. 2d 1072 - Council v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2000

3 state decisions

10198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See Council v. State, 442 So.2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

BASKIN, Judge

¶2(dissenting).

¶3I am unwilling to agree with the majority that whenever the police observe an individual holding “a manila envelope,” probable cause exists to arrest the individual for possession of marijuana. In my view, the majority holding violates basic constitutional guarantees. U.S. Const, amends. IV, XIV. I therefore dissent.

/452/so2d/952 · .json · Public domain