Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

70 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “reasons under rules 3.701(b) and 3.701(d)(11) in this case. Accordingly, the sentence is AFFIRMED. COBB, C.J., and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., concur. NOTES [1] Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.988(f). The committee note to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(8) states that the category of non-state prison sanction”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 469 So. 2d 947 - Moore v. State · Gordon v. State

2. “Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or community control must be in accordance with the guidelines. The sentence imposed after revocation of probation may be included within the original cell (guidelines range) or may be increased to the next higher cell (guidelines range) without requiring a reason for departure. (Emphasis added).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 475 So. 2d 1356 - Boldes v. State

3. “The Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal Procedure (3.701, 3.988 — Sentencing Guidelines), 451 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1984). See also, Committee Note (d)(11), providing, in part:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 458 So. 2d 13 - Carney v. State