Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 452 SW2D 498 - Renesto v. State

Renesto v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Holland v. State (1988), Morgan v. State (1985)

25 state decisions

11019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Henry v. Mississippi · Darden v. State · Wall v. State · Washburn v. State · Sensabaugh v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well established that a plea of guilty to a felony charge before a jury admits the existence of ¿11 facts necessary to establish guilt and, in such cases, the introduction of testimony by the State is to enable the jury to intelligently exercise the discretion which the law vests in them touching the penalty to be assessed.” Darden v. State (Tex.Cr.App.1968) 430 S.W.2d 494 , 495 and cases there cited; Lewis v. State (Tex.Cr.App.1969) 438 S.W.2d 816 ; Reyna v. State (Tex.Cr.App.1968) 434 S.W.2d 362 ; Renesto v. State (Tex.Cr.App.1970) 452 S.W.2d 498 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It has been the consistent holding of this Court that evidence of the results of a lie detector or polygraph test is not admissible on behalf of either the State or the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.