In Re Toft’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1501 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1502 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1506 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1508 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1515 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1521 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Pennzoil Company v. Texaco Inc · Hilton v. Guyot · United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is banned under U.S. law, and it would seemingly result in criminal liability under the Wiretap Act and the Privacy Act for those who carried it out.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the relief sought by the Foreign Representative,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.