Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 F.2d 36 - United States v. Stratton

United States v. Stratton’s Empirical Analysis

453 F.2d 36 · 1972

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
8
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Commonwealth v. Yount (1974), United States v. O'Connell (1988)

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 19 state decisions

400197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3056 (Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 472

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · Massiah v. United States · Saia v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think the knowledge of one officer is the knowledge of all and that in the operation of an investigative or police agency the collective knowledge and the available objective facts are the criteria to be used in assessing probable cause. The arresting officer himself need not possess all of the available information.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he test of probable cause is not the articulation of the policeman's subjective theory but the objective view of the facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.