Allen v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
453 F.2d 970 · 1972
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 4 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably United States v. Thevis (1982), State v. Schevers (1999)
18 federal appellate · 4 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Cataldo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Spontaneous identifications under such conditions might be said to emphasize the witness’ reliability, rather than the reverse.” At 974.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“. .A one-way glass viewing in a police station of which the suspect is ignorant is such a flagrant constitutional violation that no prosecutor should be surprised if, faced with such a viewing occurring after the date of this opinion, we conclude that the fact that it was thought necessary was a conclusive admission that the witness required unconstitutional assistance.” Allen v. Moore, 453 F.2d 970 (1st Cir. 1972).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Northup · State v. Boyd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.