Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 F.3d 112 - Williams v. Utica College of Syracuse University

Williams v. Utica College of Syracuse University’s Empirical Analysis

453 F.3d 112 · 2006

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
September 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 67 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Gonzalez v. Caballero (2008), In re Publication Paper Antitrust Litigation (2012)

5 federal appellate · 67 district ·

570200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from New York Southern District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · 25 Cal. 2d 486 - Ybarra v. Spangard · Martin v. Herzog · Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. · Hayut v. State University of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A dispute regarding a material fact is genuine if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law,”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) the defendant owed the plaintiff a cognizable duty of care; (2) the defendant breached that duty; and (3) the plaintiff suffered damage as a proximate result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.