Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 F.3d 13 - O'Brien v. Marshall

O'Brien v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

453 F.3d 13 · 2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2023

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

30200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simmons v. United States · Griffin v. California · Chambers v. Mississippi · Washington v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]ederal rights are violated only when state rules or particular results are shocking or indefensible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.