Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 F. Supp. 604 - Lien v. Beehner

453 F. Supp. 604 - Lien v. Beehner’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2004 · most notably Hohri v. United States (1986), Barrett v. United States (1982)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

2301978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 42 U.S.C. § 233 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 42 U.S.C. § 254B (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009)

Relies on Ingraham v. Wright · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Best Bearings Co. v. United States · Kielwien v. United States · Melo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “strong equitable considerations notwithstanding, the two-year limitation period of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2401(b) cannot be tolled or waived.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.