Greenberg v. McCabe’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2005 · most notably 318 Pa. Super. 90 - Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. (1984), Dalrymple v. Brown (1997)
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dioguardi v. United States · Ayers v. Morgan · United States v. Oregon Lumber Co. · Neville Chemical Co. v. Union Carbide Corp. · Borgia v. City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At issue is the objective effect of the defendant's [conduct] on discoverability by a reasonable person.... [T]he statutory period does not begin to run if ... the plaintiff's failure of discovery, objectively determined, is brought about by the very nature of the defendant's conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the jury might well have concluded that the defendant’s statement that the sexual relationship was wrong reflected his feeling that sex between him and the plaintiff was improper or immoral, rather than his opinion that it was improper psychiatric care, and that it was reasonable for plaintiff not to infer that the treatment was damaging for her.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Wallace“where the injury and cause thereof are subtler and more complicated than in the normal malpractice case, it seems particularly inappropriate to determine as a matter of law what the plaintiff should have known”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.