Everett v. 357 Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
24 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Flagg v. AliMed, Inc. (2013), Godfrey v. Globe Newspaper Co. (2010)
24 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12113 (§ 103 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 49 U.S.C. § 31102
Relies on National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc. · Reiter v. Cooper · Sanchez v. Standard Brands, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party who wants to file a civil action charging discrimination in employment under Chapter 15IB must first file the charge with the MCAD.”); see also Singleton, 660 F.Supp.2d at 146 ; Everett v. 357 Corp., 453 Mass. 585 , 904 N.E.2d 733, 746 (2009). . See Fant, 239 F.3d at 11 ; Lattimore v. Polaroid Corp., 99 F.3d 456, 464 (1st Cir.1996) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a fundamental tenet of law is that lack of subject matter jurisdiction is fatal to a plaintiff's claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to nullify an entire, completed civil jury trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.