Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 Mich. 308 - White v. Beasley

White v. Beasley’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Maiden v. Rozwood (1999), Wallace v. Ohio Department of Commerce (2002)

22 state decisions

160199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an assumption by the municipality, through promises or actions, of an affirmative duty to act on behalf of the party who was injured; (2) knowledge on the part of the municipality's agent that inaction could lead to harm; (3) some form of direct contact between the municipality's agents and the injured party; and (4) that party's justifiable reliance on the municipality's affirmative undertaking....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[g]overnment employees should enjoy personal protection from tort liability based on their actions in conformity with, or failure to conform to, statutes or ordinances not intended to create tort liability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]f the duty which the official authority imposes upon an officer is a duty to the public, a failure to perform it, or an inadequate or erroneous performance, must be a public, not an individual injury, and must be redressed, if at all, in some form of public prosecution. On the other hand, if the duty is a duty to the individual, then a neglect to perform it, or to perform it properly is an individual wrong, and may support an individual action for damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.