Partlow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Bivins v. State (1995), Wagner v. State (1985)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Escobedo v. Illinois · Brown v. Illinois · Michigan v. Mosley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(d) Except for those cases in which the juvenile court has no jurisdiction in accordance with section 1(d) [31-6-2-1(d)] of this chapter, the court shall upon motion of the prosecutor and after full investigation and hearing, waive jurisdiction if it finds that: (1) The child is charged with an act that, if committed by an adult, would be: (C) Reckless homicide as a class C felony under IC 35-42-1-5; (2) There is probable cause to believe that the child has committed the act; and (3) The child was sixteen [16] years of age or older when the act charged was allegedly committed; unless it would be in the best interests of the child and of the safety and welfare of the community for him to remain within the juvenile justice system."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gorzelanny“"We note that the defendant was not given the death penalty and therefore this issue has been resolved without prejudice to him and the issue is moot. [Ci tation omitted.] Furthermore, the defendant has not furnished us with a transcript of the voir dire proceedings nor pointed out in any way what transpired there that would occasion the prejudice he claims was apparent. Thus, there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in the denial of this motion and no showing that the defendant was in any way prejudiced by the trial court's ruling." Id. at 270.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smedley v. State“If the child is in detention and a petition has been filed, either a fact-finding hearing or a waiver hearing must be commenced within twenty [20] days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) after the petition is filed. If the child is not in detention, the hearing must be commenced within sixty [60] days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays ) after the petition is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. A.S. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.