453 N.J. Super. 55 - State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)
Relies on United States v. Wade · State v. Kelly · State v. Henderson · United States v. Delker · United States v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to rebut the State's evidence of probable cause, the judge must first ask for a proffer regarding the witness' anticipated testimony and its relevancy to the issue of probable cause, and how the anticipated testimony negates the State's evidence already adduced at the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pinkston“a defendant must make a proffer demonstrating how the anticipated testimony would rebut or diminish the otherwise clear and convincing evidence the State must produce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pinkston“[A]bsent something credible to challenge the reliability or the correctness of the government's proffer, the Court need not compel live witnesses to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pinkston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.