Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 P2D 898 - Roberts v. State

Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
August 1989
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Elkins v. United States · Burdeau v. McDowell · Nardone v. United States · Schwartz v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In regard to evidence obtained by wiretap or other eavesdropping devices being used in court proceedings the bill does not in any way change the existing law of Alaska. The admittance or rejection of such evidence is left to case law and the rules governing the admissibility of evidence as interpreted by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.