Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 P3D 1172 - – State v. Harris –

– State v. Harris –’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Neder v. United States · State v. Ward · State v. Buggs · State v. Plummer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence used to support a conviction, an appellate court looks at all the evidence 'in a light most favorable to the State to determine whether a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' A reviewing court 'generally will”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No party may assign as error the . . . failure to give an instruction . . . unless the party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict . . . unless . . . the failure to give an instruction is clearly erroneous.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'whether the defendant's actions could have given rise to multiple counts of the charged crime or whether the alleged conduct was unitary.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.