Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 So. 2d 1102 - Downs v. State

453 So. 2d 1102 - Downs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State (2000), 490 So. 2d 927 - Maxwell v. Wainwright (1986)

1 federal appellate · 91 state decisions

4301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Engle v. Isaac · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret · Knight v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The benchmark for judging claims of ineffectiveness ... is whether the conduct of counsel `so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]efendant must affirmatively prove prejudice.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[S]trategic choices made after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable; and strategic choices made after less than complete investigation are reasonable precisely to the extent that reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigations. In other words, counsel has a duty to make reasonable investigations or to make a reasonable decision that makes particular investigations unnecessary. In any ineffectiveness case, a particular decision not to investigate must be directly assessed for reasonableness in all the circumstances, applying a heavy measure of deference to counsel's judgments.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.