Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 So. 2d 505 - Smith v. State

453 So. 2d 505 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Allen · 103 S. Ct. 247 - Beneficial Finance of Kansas, Inc. v. United States · 438 So. 2d 830 - Florida Bar v. Imand · 437 So. 2d 1057 - Bell v. State · Rose v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After the jurors have retired to consider their verdict, if they request additional instructions or to have any testimony read to them they shall be conducted into the courtroom by the officer who has them in charge and the court may give them such additional instructions or may order such testimony read to them. Such instructions shall be given and such testimony read only after notice to the prosecuting attorney and to counsel for the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.