Markham v. Corlett

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 8, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-08-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1994

4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“This action contesting a tax assessment is barred by the provisions of Section 194.171(3), (5) and (6), Florida Statutes (1983). The taxes in question were not paid before they became delinquent. (Emphasis supplied.)”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Diaz v. Bystrom

Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · Davis v. Davis · Millstream Corp. v. Dade County

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This action contesting a tax assessment is barred by the provisions of Section 194.-171(3), (5) and (6), Florida Statutes (1983). *908The taxes in question were not paid before they became delinquent. The judgment on appeal is reversed upon authority of Reid v. Lucom, 349 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. den. 358 So.2d 132 (Fla.1978), cert. den. 439 U.S. 860, 99 S.Ct. 180, 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1978). See, also, Cowart v. Perkins, 445 So.2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Millstream Corporation v. Dade County, 340 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

¶2Reversed and Remanded.

LETTS, HERSEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.