Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 453 SO2D 938 - Friedman v. Backman

Friedman v. Backman’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
7
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2020

10 state decisions

3019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quick & Reilly, Inc. v. Perlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n a frivolous suit against a lawyer, he is entitled to attorney's fees for his time and effort under section 57.105, just as he is for services rendered by counsel he employs to represent him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “logical because, as the saying goes `a lawyer's time and advice are his stock in trade'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.