Grayson v. Grayson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 1995
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 91 Cal. App. 3d 259 - In Re Marriage of Ben-Yehoshua · Allen v. Allen · Smith v. Smith · Sullivan v. Sullivan · S. B. A. v. K. L. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) This State (a) Is the home state of the child at the time of the commencement of the proceeding; or (b) Had been the child’s home state within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this State because of his removal or retention by a person claiming his custody or for other reasons, and a parent or person acting as parent continues to live in this State(.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Albert v. Phillips“(2) It is in the best interests of the child that a court of this State assume jurisdiction because: (a) The child and his parents, or the child and at least 1 contestant, have a significant connection with this State; and (b) There is available in this State substantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training and personal relationships;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Albert v. Phillips
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.