In Re Hurtt’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Comprehensive Accounting Corp. v. Pearson · In Re Morton · Glance v. S · In Re Cronkleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not properly assertable that merely placing an obligation on a schedule of secured debts makes it a fully secured obligation. Neither the Court nor the debtor is permitted to close its eyes to the obvious, as reflected by the schedules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Bosserman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.