Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 F.2d 679 - Hill v. Page

Hill v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

454 F.2d 679 · 1971

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2001

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

801971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Sanders v. United States · Entsminger v. Iowa · Bell v. Alabama · James Richard Ellis v. State of Oklahoma and Warden Ray H. Page

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion the petitioner’s appeal as taken did not indicate ineffective assistance of counsel as urged, nor did it constitute a denial of the constitutional rights of petitioner. The procedure followed was not contrary to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 nor Entsminger v. Iowa, 386 U.S. 748 , 87 S.Ct. 1402 , 18 L.Ed.2d 501 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.