Bracewell v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis
454 F.3d 1234 · 2006
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Tyler v. DH Capital Management, Inc. (2013), In the Matter Of: Supreme Beef Processors, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture (2006)
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1207 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Cannon v. University of Chicago · United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc. · Lamie v. United States Trustee · Trw Inc v. Adelaide Andrews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is one wrinkle in cases, like the present one, which began as Chapter 12 proceedings but were converted to Chapter 7. Section 1207(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, which applies to Chapter 12 cases, expands the definition of property of the estate to include: “all property of the kind specified in such section [§ 541] that the debtor acquires after the commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7 of this title....” 11 U.S.C. § 1207 (a)(1). The practical effect of that expansion in the temporal limitation is to move the cutoff date for the acquisition of property from the filing of the bankruptcy case to the time it is converted under Chapter 7.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case”) (emphasis added); see also Bracewell v. Kelley (In re Bracewell), 454 F.3d 1234, 1239 (11th Cir.2006) (debtor’s”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1)all property of the kind specified in such section that the debtor acquires after the commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7, 11, or 12 of this title, whichever comes first; and (2)earnings from services performed by the debtor after the. commencement of the case but before the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to a case under chapter 7,11, or 12 of this title, whichever comes first.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.