Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 F.3d 1300 - United States v. Martinelli

United States v. Martinelli’s Empirical Analysis

454 F.3d 1300 · 2006

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
3
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably United States v. Bradley (2011), United States v. Hill (2011)

18 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

430200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Bonner v. City of Prichard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the requested instruction was a correct statement of the law, (2) its subject matter was not substantially covered by other instructions, and (3) its subject matter dealt with an issue in the trial court that was so important that failure to give it seriously impaired the defendant’s ability to defend himself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “means that an act was done voluntarily and intentionally and not because of a mistake or by accident. The word”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In reviewing a district court's ruling on a motion to suppress, we review findings of fact for clear error and the application of the law to those facts de novo.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.