Udell v. J M’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2021
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. · United States v. Borden Co. · United States v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plainly an educational benefit made under a program funded by the government and Udell [had] an obligation to repay funds received as an educational benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Micko“made, insured or guaranteed by a governmental unit, or made under any program funded in whole or in part by a governmental unit or nonprofit institution,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Micko“the plain language of a statute is normally regarded as conclusive”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Micko
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.