Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 F.3d 24 - Toledo v. L Snchez V M

Toledo v. L Snchez V M’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

34 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Bowers 05-2269 v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Ncaa, Román v. University of Puerto Rico (2011)

34 district · 2 state decisions

360200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Goss v. Lopez · Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the sounder approach is to focus the entire City of Boerne test on the particular category of state conduct at issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To determine whether prophylactic legislation under § 5 is valid, a court must consider: (1) the constitutional right or rights that Congress sought to protect when it enacted the statute; (2) whether there was a history of constitutional violations to support Congress’s determination that prophylactic legislation was necessary; and (3) whether the statute is a congruent and proportional response to the history and pattern of constitutional violations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Discrimination against disabled students in education affects disabled persons' future ability to exercise and participate in the most basic rights and responsibilities of citizenship, such as voting and participation in public programs and services. The relief available under Title II of the ADA is congruent and proportional to the injury and the means adopted to remedy the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.