Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 F.3d 721 - Dolis v. Chambers

Dolis v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

454 F.3d 721 · 2006

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Kaba v. Ea Stepp E (2006), Fairchild v. Workman (2009)

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

140200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Duncan v. Walker · Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker · Rhines v. Weber · Day v. McDonough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[v]ery shortly after the district court dismissed [the petitioner's] case, it became impossible for him to refile it, because it would be barred by the statute of limitations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it would be wise for a petitioner to file in both state and federal court simultaneously, particularly where there is some procedural uncertainty about the state court post-conviction proceeding, and then ask the district court to stay the federal case until the state case concludes to ensure that she does not miss the one-year deadline.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.