Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 F.3d 82 - Stroni v. Gonzales

Stroni v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis

454 F.3d 82 · 2006

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Pan v. Gonzales (2007), Pulisir v. Mukasey (2008)

23 federal appellate ·

270200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ryan v. Royal Insurance Co. of America · Gailius v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Bocova v. Gonzales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review legal conclusions de novo, 'with appropriate deference to the agency's interpretation of the underlying statute in accordance with administrative law principles.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We review the BIA's and/or IJ's findings of fact under the substantial evidence standard, reversing only if 'the record evidence would compel a reasonable factfinder to make a contrary determination.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.