Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 F. Supp. 527 - Hooker v. Arnold

454 F. Supp. 527 - Hooker v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 1983
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Imbler v. Pachtman · Wood v. Strickland · Procunier v. Navarette · Ingraham v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the responsibility “to determine appropriate housing for all persons .. . based on various factors including the status of the individual and security concerns presented by each individual”; (2) that his authority was often delegated to subordinates who made individual determinations based on institutional policy; and (3) that the policy of the institution was that “pretrial inmates,” and, it appears from other portions of the affidavit, pre-sentence inmates as well, “would normally be housed in detention status as Marshal’s holdovers.” Id. (footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A Warden of a prison is clearly responsible for the implementation of a prison policy notwithstanding the fact that subordinates are directed to carry the policy out. Under the circumstances here, defendant cannot be granted summary judgment on the ground that he lacked personal involvement in any deprivation. Id. at 529 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.