Cole v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1990
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on R. L. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and more specifically intended to exclude spousal abuse from the sphere of recovery. Id. Nina's argument consists of various hypothetical situations which, when compared with Nina's own tragic situation, reflect the absurd results occasionally rendered by application of the family exclusionary clause. For instance, Nina points out that had the other adult murder vie-tim's son lived (he too was murdered) and had been physically unharmed by David, he would have qualified for benefits, while Nina,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hollis v. State“However, the purpose of subsection (b) of the act excluding family members of the perpetrator from recovering is aimed at preventing collusive arrangements among family members”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hollis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.