Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 NW2D 544 - Kier v. Kier

Kier v. Kier’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably Grode v. Grode (1996), Whalen v. Whalen (1992)

25 state decisions

180199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Malcolm v. Malcolm · Lien v. Lien · Huffman v. Shevlin · Johnson v. Johnson · Garnos v. Garnos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining the proper interpretation of an agreement incorporated into a divorce decree, a court must seek to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In exercising its discretion, a court must follow a two step procedure. First, the court must determine what constitutes a reasonable attorney fee. Second, the court must determine what portion of that fee should be paid by the opposing party. The second step requires a consideration of ‘the parties’ relative worth, income, liquidity, and whether either party unreasonably increased the time spent on the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Any past due support payments are not subject to modification by a court or administrative entity of this state, except those occurring in any period in which there is pending a petition for modification of the support obligation, but only from the date that notice of hearing of the petition has been given to the ... obligor[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.