Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 454 SO2D 587 - Fay v. Mincey

Fay v. Mincey’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
7
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably 808 So. 2d 145 - Darling v. State (2002), 483 So. 2d 1383 - Kruse v. State (1986)

31 state decisions

1601984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State · Mannino v. International Manufacturing Co. · 223 So. 2d 68 - Coppolino v. State · Stevens v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “well-established that an expert does not need a special degree or certificate in order to be qualified as an expert witness in a specialized area,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify about it in the form of an opinion....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.