¶1Upon review of the record we believe that there is an adequate evidentiary basis to support the trial court’s judgment can-celling a warranty deed executed by the appellee in favor of the appellants. We also reject appellants’ claim that the trial court erred in failing to reform the terms of the deed, there having been no claim for reformation made by any of the parties in the trial court.
454 So. 2d 682
454 So.2d 682
9 Fla.L.Weekly 1687
Tupica v. Macina
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 1, 1984
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-08-01
Decided 1984-08-01