Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

454 So. 2d 682

454 So.2d 682

9 Fla.L.Weekly 1687

Tupica v. Macina

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-08-01

Decided 1984-08-01

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon review of the record we believe that there is an adequate evidentiary basis to support the trial court’s judgment can-celling a warranty deed executed by the appellee in favor of the appellants. We also reject appellants’ claim that the trial court erred in failing to reform the terms of the deed, there having been no claim for reformation made by any of the parties in the trial court.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
/454/so2d/682 · .json · Public domain