454 So. 2d 691 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

57 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Sentences imposed after revocation of probation or community control must be in accordance with the guidelines. The sentence imposed after revocation of probation may be included within the original cell (guidelines range) or may be increased to the next higher cell (guidelines range) without requiring a reason for departure.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 454 So. 2d 694 - McGrath v. State · 478 So. 2d 842 - Ehrenshaft v. State

2. “[W]e hold that upon remand, appellant shall be entitled to be resentenced under [an earlier version of] the guidelines... . We also concur in the Carter [ v. State, 452 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)] court's observation that a violation of probation may justify departure from the presumptive sentence established in the guidelines provided the basis for the departure is stated in writing... .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 561 So. 2d 554 - Pope v. State

3. “that under some circumstances the failure to provide a contemporaneous written statement could be harmless error where an oral statement is promptly reduced to writing in a manner so as not to prejudice in any way an appellant's right of review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 475 So. 2d 1031 - Edwins v. State