454 So. 2d 783 - Ebeling v. Voltz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[e]xtrinsic fraud, or in other words, fraud alleged in the prevention of the will contest, as opposed to in the making of the will, would appear to be the type of circumstance that would preclude relief in the probate court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schilling v. Herrera

2. “falls into the category of cases that DeWitt considers outside the purview of Section 733.103(2), Florida Statutes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schilling v. Herrera

3. “the circumstances surrounding the tortious conduct effectively preclude adequate relief in the probate court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Schilling v. Herrera